| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Systematic review v Literature review

Page history last edited by a.brettle@salford.ac.uk 12 years, 4 months ago

A systematic review is an overview of primary research studies conducted according to an explicit and reproducable methodology - within evidence based practice systematic reviews are used as a good way of presenting rigorous summaries of the research evidence to practitioners and policy makers.

 

A literature review provides an overview of the literature in a particular area - it can be critical or systematic (or neither!)

 

The following presentations outline the differences and the process and practicalities of undertaking systematic reviews

 

Systematic reviews: practicalities and realities - Alison Brettle

Systematic reviews: critical appraisal - Alison Brettle

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses - Alison Brettle

 

There are a number of organisations who specialise in systematic reviews and have provided indepth guides or handbooks in conducting them.  They also make databases of reviews available.

 

¡Cochrane Collaboration

http://www.cochrane.org/

http://www.cochrane.org/docs/irmg.htm

 

¡Centre for Reviews and Dissemination   http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/

handbook for conducting systematic reviews,

http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/methods.htm

Searching for systematic reviews http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/revs.htm

 

¡EPPI-Centre – Stages of a review

http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=89

 

¡SCIE - The conduct of systematic research reviews for SCIE knowledge reviews http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/details.asp?pubID=111

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.